FDM runs an operating model more akin to US ITSAs, with a contingent of over 250 ‘employed contractors’ called Mounties (who, I assume, ‘always get their man’?) working alongside traditional freelance contractors. Hence the respectable (for an ITSA) margins. But from what I can see, their services are pretty generic, including AD&M (application development & management), testing and training. I just think this bodyshop model is so exposed in current times; if they failed to grow materially over the past ‘boom’ decade, the outlook surely must look difficult over these next couple of years.
Monday, 9 March 2009
FDM’s Mounties keep on riding
(By Anthony Miller – Monday, 9th March 2009 8:00am). When we last wrote about ITSA-cum-IT services group FDM back in 2000, they were privately held with prior year revenues around £41m. We said at the time “FDM looks like another mid-size ITSA that will be snapped up by a hungry predator”. Not quite, it seems! Today FDM is AIM-listed (since 2005) with 2008 revenues just reported at £52m (see here). Not what you might call stellar growth over the past decade but at least revenues are 5% higher than 2007 and margins are up too: gross margins were 26.2% (2007: 22.5%) and operating margins were 9.6% (2007: 8.1%). However, UK revenues (80% of the total) declined 2%, though UK PBT rose nearly 14%. About 13% of revenues came from Europe and the balance from America.
FDM runs an operating model more akin to US ITSAs, with a contingent of over 250 ‘employed contractors’ called Mounties (who, I assume, ‘always get their man’?) working alongside traditional freelance contractors. Hence the respectable (for an ITSA) margins. But from what I can see, their services are pretty generic, including AD&M (application development & management), testing and training. I just think this bodyshop model is so exposed in current times; if they failed to grow materially over the past ‘boom’ decade, the outlook surely must look difficult over these next couple of years.
FDM runs an operating model more akin to US ITSAs, with a contingent of over 250 ‘employed contractors’ called Mounties (who, I assume, ‘always get their man’?) working alongside traditional freelance contractors. Hence the respectable (for an ITSA) margins. But from what I can see, their services are pretty generic, including AD&M (application development & management), testing and training. I just think this bodyshop model is so exposed in current times; if they failed to grow materially over the past ‘boom’ decade, the outlook surely must look difficult over these next couple of years.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment