In Newspapers, Garfield makes the point that far fewer people buy newspap
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2884c/2884c3fa256ba00ae119bd40437c581da990903d" alt=""
On TV networks, the rampant use of DVRs (where viewers miss out the adverts) coupled with a significant reduction in advertising spend, has led to major reductions in production spend. Indeed, we have seen this only too well at ITV in the UK. So TV networks eventually will not produce programmes. Which rather begs the question of what they are there for? Which eventually means they will disappear.
But it w
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79fd5/79fd53940266d942ff32a4eaab81d2eeb7cbb4f6" alt=""
So, here we have all these ‘channels’, all attracting more and more subscribers but none of them having any decent model on how to monetise them. At the moment it feels great. As a subscriber, I now read all the daily newspapers for free on line. I can play all the music I want and watch all the videos I want, for free. I can keep up with all my friends and family on Facebook – for free. I can waste hours reading drivel on Twitter – for free. Indeed, closer to home, many of you read UKHotnews for free each day too!
Just like the model used by the banks (and the government) in the last decade, it cannot last. Most of the current ‘free players’ will fail. Unless new models to monetise are produced, we will all lose out as the very free services we currently rather like disappear.
No comments:
Post a Comment