This ‘defence’ would look so much more convincing if PwC didn’t list L&L on their global website as “Price Waterhouse\Lovelock & Lewes”, with offices one floor below "PricewaterhouseCoopers Pvt Ltd" in the same building and with the same phone number. Anyway, I’m glad that’s all been cleared up then.
Tuesday, 30 June 2009
PwC – did they, or didn’t they?
(By Anthony Miller – Tuesday 30th June 2009 6:00pm). Audit Satyam, that is. There’s just a wonderful story in the Times of India today (Tuesday) that it wasn’t PwC India that audited Satyam’s accounts, but Bangalore-based partner firm Lovelock & Lewes. Therefore, by some sort of weird logic, PwC claims “it wasn’t us, guv!” This is despite evidence that the auditing fees were paid into PwC’s Bangalore account before being remitted to L&L. PwC India chairman and CEO, Ramesh Rajan, helpfully explained that the firm has no manpower (I think he was referring to PwC's Bangalore office, in which he is reportedly a partner) and as part of an internal arrangement gives out their work to Lovelock and Lewes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment